| BRIDGE PERFORMANCE AWARDS
- TOP 3 RECEIVE PRIZE MONEY |
|
| School Team |
Net Bridge Deflection1
mm |
Net Deck Deflection2
(percent of allowable) |
Total Bridge Weight kg |
Percent Non- Wood3 |
Weyerhaeuser Best Overall
Design |
Best Support Structure |
Best Deck |
Most Practical Design |
Most Aesthetic Design |
Most Innovative Design |
Total Awards $ |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Oregon
State U ASCE |
7.47 |
B |
322 |
9.6 |
DQ |
8 |
DQ |
11 |
-- |
10 |
150 |
|
|
U of TN
Martin ASCE |
11.2 |
A |
313 |
5.9 |
DQ |
DQ |
DQ |
7 |
-- |
6 |
150 |
|
|
OK State
U
Team 149 ASCE |
5.05 |
46 |
384 |
15.3 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
9 |
6 |
2 |
850 |
|
|
Clarkson U ASCE |
6.09 |
A |
409 |
9.0 |
DQ |
5 |
DQ |
3 |
4 |
8 |
250 |
|
|
Ohio U ASCE |
9.01 |
B |
488 |
2.8 |
DQ |
7 |
DQ |
6 |
-- |
9 |
150 |
|
|
U of MO
Columbia ASCE |
41.7 |
B |
1096 |
3.8 |
DQ |
DQ |
DQ |
2 |
-- |
10 |
350 |
|
|
U of AR
Little Rock FPS |
3.76 |
27 |
407 |
7.0 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
7 |
600 |
|
|
Washington U - STL ASCE |
5.61 |
20 |
1180 |
18.8 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
1700 |
|
|
U of
Texas SA ASCE |
6.22 |
41 |
336 |
4.3 |
2 |
6 |
3 |
10 |
-- |
4 |
800 |
|
|
USMA
ASCE |
3.06 |
A |
383 |
8.7 |
DQ |
2 |
DQ |
5 |
2 |
3 |
800 |
|
|
OK
State U Team 158 ASCE |
6.67 |
23 |
308 |
4.1 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
-- |
9 |
1050 |
|
|
Ohio
State U ASCE |
8.23 |
A |
569 |
7.1 |
DQ |
9 |
DQ |
8 |
3 |
5 |
250 |
|
| A -- Monitor points to determine deck
deflection not properly chosen to measure! B --
Deck deflection exceeded allowable. |
| To view individual entries,
including drawings and photos, click on School/Team Name above. also,
click here for 2006 Rules. |
| |
| 1
Maximum allowed = 10.0 mm |
| 2 Maximum allowable
= deck span divided by 100. |
| 3 Max.
allowed = 25% |
| DQ = Not eligible
for performance award or Best Overall Design. Deflection exceeded
allowable. |
| ? = Inadequate
data to determine. |
| ASCE - American
Society of Civil Engineers |
| FPS - Forest
Products Society |
| |